The Sony A7 Against...
Clear all
The Sony A7 Against The Fujifilm X
The Sony A7 Against The Fujifilm X
Gruppe: Registriert
Beigetreten: 2022-03-01
New Member

Über mich

All of those autofocus third-party Sony lenses are making Sony difficult to ignore, but they are already on their way to Canon and, hopefully, Nikon as well. However, the system as a whole continues to be very strong and quite cool. I believe Sony will ultimately catch up with the competition in terms of user interface, but it will most likely take another 2-3 years. The A7rIV and A9II have shown that they will not be updated, which implies that they will not do so for the A7IV as well. As a result, we'll have to wait till the next generation comes around.  
Fujifilm lenses are well-known for their quality, so I went into this experience with a basic sense of what to anticipate. Having purchased the camera, I decided to pair it with the Fujinon mm lens. Over the course of the following six weeks, I put both the Sony and Fuji systems through their paces. And if it became absolutely essential to use HDR, I just required three brackets to do the task. That five-to-seven-shot bracketed strategy was no longer effective.  
The SB really enhances the optical performance of the lens to which it is mounted. Nevertheless, the issue of being able to purchase better resolution or more video centered bodies inside the FE ecosystem is carefully taken into consideration. People who see your photographs on high-definition displays are likely to be really impressed. Jordan's last argument, in my opinion, is the most important.  
It's one of their slower autofocus lenses, but that's not an issue for me since I'm not a fast shooter. I wouldn't use it for sports photography, but there are other lenses available for that purpose. When I'm shooting, I shoot with manual focus 98 percent of the time, so it's not a big deal for me at all. However, having said that, Sony's autofocus would be preferable. For landscape photographers, only medium format cameras have a definite advantage over digital SLRs.  
However, I am certain that I could stress test all of the cameras in order to make one camera seem better than another. To provide an example, the Nikon is better at fast focusing on items as they enter the picture, but the Sony always prefers to shoot more in the center frame. The Nikon method is sometimes preferred, while the Sony method is sometimes preferred. I've tried the Sony IBIS + IS with the Batis 85, and it's still not as good as the Nikon IBIS alone, at least not in my opinion. According to my experiments with the Canon RF 35mm f1.8 IS, the lens IS performed somewhat better than the Sony IBIS, with the exception of tilt shaking, which the Sony IBIS was able to compensate for.  
Nikon attempted to replicate this faux-film camera approach with the DF, but there was never a second one. In spite of the fact that I will always shoot in RAW, I have spent far less time tweaking with my Fujifilm photographs since they came out so darn well. It seems to me that there is one application in which the noise advantage of FF is quite useful. For landscape photographers who want to capture images with a broad dynamic range and need to bring the shadows up while still publishing the picture at a huge size, full frame may be a benefit.  
Sony has made significant strides since the introduction of the first A7 generation, and the company now has 31 lenses in its arsenal for the full-frame series alone, which is a record. There is a greater variety of options for every budget and need, which has become one of the system's most significant advantages. If you're not acquainted with the two systems, it's crucial to spare a few words for the lenses, as you should always do.  
RF 35mm F1.8 is a good lens, however it has one of the worst astigmatisms I've ever seen in a lens of this caliber. I really like Fujifilm because they are wonderful for all of those inexpensive Chinese third-party lenses that are a lot of fun, particularly for hobbyists, and they are easy to work with. I'm particularly fond of the new Kamlan 50mm f1.1 II lens, which is now available for $300. There are several very amazing third-party lenses available right now that are good enough for Sony cameras, namely the Samyang / Rokinon lenses. This is one of the best things about Sony cameras.  
The cameras are quite similar, but the lenses you purchase now will function on subsequent bodies in the future, which is a significant advantage of using FE lenses rather than Fuji's APS-C lenses today. Great work Chris and Jordan on this video; I'm a huge fan of these kind of comparisons and thought you did a fantastic job. Another advantage of full-frame is that if you decide you require ultrahigh resolution, such as 50 Mpx, and are ready to pay for the lenses to go with it, you can use it. The D3, D300, and D3000 model separations made a little amount of sense back then, but mirrorless has utterly obliterated those divisions and rendered them entirely meaningless.  
Because FE lenses are fundamentally more useful than standard lenses. When it comes to modern FF bodies, the T4 is at the top of the line, while the A7III is at the bottom. Future improvements on the FE side will allow you to reuse your lens purchases to a far greater degree than on the X-mount side, allowing you to save money on future purchases.  
These more subtle "filters" do not alter the overall appearance of a scene, but rather alter the way particular colors are caught while also adding a new tone curve to the image. A custom button may be assigned to enable F-log Assist, which displays what the video seems to look like in Rec. 709 format on the Fujifilm X-T4. This enables me to shoot in log mode while still being able to see whether or not my white balance and exposure are accurate. This is without a doubt another significant edge in favor of the X-T4.



Soziale Netzwerke
Kommentare zur Frage
Erhaltene Likes